| Author |
Message |
Mike (Chastitylocked)
New member
Username: Chastitylocked
Post Number: 88
Registered: 2-2005
| | Posted on Monday, August 11, 2008 - 6:48 pm: | |
I havent posted here in a very very long time. Ive gotten away from the chastity fetish for various reasons but I return with a question on the behalf of someone else.
A female friend of mine is seriously considering chastity. Ive told her all I know about chastity belts, devices and such. One thing I know very little about is Chastity Piercings. Ive seen a bit about it online, but, i was hoping for more of a personal insight on it.
It seems like the "Chastity Piercing" is a Outer Labia Piercing, that can be closed together by a lock. From the sounds of it, it isnt a terribly painful experience, though, does take a little more time to heal. But, this brings up many many questions.
Does anyone here have personal experience with it? or have great knowledge of it? This advise will basically be for someone who has only has her ears pierced and will want to know all the ins and outs before considering this option.
Thanks!
Mike |
Robert Pinkerton (Robertpinkerton)
Senior Member
Username: Robertpinkerton
Post Number: 616
Registered: 8-2001
| | Posted on Tuesday, August 12, 2008 - 1:34 pm: | |
Mike,
[1] From the home page, click on General Information, then scroll down to Infibulation Explained.
[2] Google Female Genital Piercing, then search within results for chastity.
Robert Pinkerton, heresiarch@sbcglobal.net |
Mike (Chastitylocked)
New member
Username: Chastitylocked
Post Number: 89
Registered: 2-2005
| | Posted on Wednesday, August 13, 2008 - 6:51 am: | |
Thanks for the link and all the information in that write up.
I do have 2 questions:
1) How many rings should she get? just one on each side, or, multiples on each side?
2) If she does get multiples, can you still use a lock, or, do you need to go another route?
Thanks! |
Robert Pinkerton (Robertpinkerton)
Senior Member
Username: Robertpinkerton
Post Number: 617
Registered: 8-2001
| | Posted on Wednesday, August 13, 2008 - 12:07 pm: | |
Mike, understand that my answer comes from mundane practicality, rather than any fetish interest. A single piercing in each labium majus, opposite each other and over the center of the entrance to her vagina, is quite enough to be sure. Any more than that is irrelevant ornamentation. Too, the shackle of the infibulating padlock -- which itself categorically M U S T be physiologically inert for safety's sake -- should go directly through both piercings, rather than rings placed in the piercings and the lock shackle passed through the rings. This indirect infibulation might have a titillating appearance, but it is less secure.
Robert Pinkerton, heresiarch@sbcglobal.net |
Mike (Chastitylocked)
New member
Username: Chastitylocked
Post Number: 90
Registered: 2-2005
| | Posted on Wednesday, August 13, 2008 - 5:15 pm: | |
So maybe im miss-understanding. The woman would get the 2 piercings put into her skin, and, the padlock goes into the piercing holes? If thats so, whats the point of adding the 2 rings into the holes?
I think i cant visualize this, can you recommend some good photos for examples? |
Susan (Builder)
New member
Username: Builder
Post Number: 1037
Registered: 5-2003
| | Posted on Thursday, August 14, 2008 - 4:40 am: | |
My friend ML has 3 pairs of outer labia rings (but even 2 rings in the right place is probably enough). She, Tollyboy and I developed and improved a simple locking system ML suggested, which is not a listed product yet. ML got her first pair of rings two years ago and then had another four done (in one go) early this year. She described her new device on Alt.com (a forum she’s part of) and got lots of interest there.
The Swiss maker of hypoallergenic locks (designed to pass through the flesh of the piercing itself) is not trading any more, so the choice is limited. There are tiny ornamental piercing safe stainless hasp padlocks available.
http://www.wildcat.co.uk/shop/product_info.php?cPath=1192_1203&products_id=437
These padlocks open with a tiny screwdriver, not a key; and the smallest ring thickness available is 2mm. So you need to stretch the 1.6mm piercing or start at 2.0 or 2.4mm
Outer labia piercings take about 3 months to heal properly; and some professional body piercers will only do one pair at a time. You could try putting a very light padlock trough the rings after 4 weeks but DON’T rush it. At the moment there aren’t any proper locks, which could pass through the piercing itself, so I suggest 2mm or 2.4mm titanium segment-closing rings to start with. |
Mike (Chastitylocked)
New member
Username: Chastitylocked
Post Number: 92
Registered: 2-2005
| | Posted on Thursday, August 14, 2008 - 10:15 am: | |
So it sounds like 2 is plenty, with a good safe padlock that can pass through the rings? Or should you do another ring in the center, that passes through both of the outer rings? I worry the padlock wont prevent much if you just had the 2 outter rings. |
Robert Pinkerton (Robertpinkerton)
Senior Member
Username: Robertpinkerton
Post Number: 618
Registered: 8-2001
| | Posted on Thursday, August 14, 2008 - 12:38 pm: | |
Economy of force, i.e.: The minimum that is certain to do the job (here, preventing the lass from taking part in unauthorized coitus) right. A surfeit of assorted piercing "jewelry" in elsewhere than the right place, is visually ".. all sound and fury [accomplishing] nothing...," where a single padlock correctly placed, locks out trespassers.
It seems to be canonical in BDSM/fetish-interest oriented erotica, that if one fetish in a given piece of artwork titillates, more than one fetish depicted, titillates a larger audience; or, conversely, depiction of something practical in reasonable amounts, gets multiplied by overdoing it beyond mundane practicality. OK, do you want to accomplish a task? Or make an aesthetic splash in first priority, leaving actual accomplishment of the purported task second to an excessive mere show? (In the Photo Albums section of the Yahoo! group, Chastity Piercings, one can see a multiplicity of photos of piercings carried far in excess of any practical purpose, as if chastity were secondary to mere display.)
Robert Pinkerton, heresiarch@sbcglobal.net |
Mike (Chastitylocked)
New member
Username: Chastitylocked
Post Number: 95
Registered: 2-2005
| | Posted on Thursday, August 14, 2008 - 6:25 pm: | |
I do a search on yahoo groups for "Chastity Piercings" and it dosent return any results. Could you provide me with a link?
And no, she certainly isnt looking to set a new record or be an original, but to do something thats been safely done before. |
Chastity User (Chastityuser)
New member
Username: Chastityuser
Post Number: 37
Registered: 3-2003
| | Posted on Thursday, August 14, 2008 - 8:57 pm: | |
Mike, also note that in practicality chastity piercings can only prevent penetration not orgasm a belt is needed to prevent orgasm.
James |
Robert Pinkerton (Robertpinkerton)
Senior Member
Username: Robertpinkerton
Post Number: 619
Registered: 8-2001
| | Posted on Friday, August 15, 2008 - 5:55 am: | |
Mike, here is the pertinent link: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chastitypiercings/
Robert Pinkerton, heresiarch@sbcglobal.net |
Eugene Samuels (Bdsamm)
New member
Username: Bdsamm
Post Number: 32
Registered: 4-2005
| | Posted on Friday, August 15, 2008 - 8:00 am: | |
Unfortunately, the padlocks Susan pointed to can be opened with a simple screwdriver. The only manufacturer of "real" piercing safe locks seems to have gone out of business. I thought they were going to resume under another name but cannot find them. (Robert, do you know any more on this?)
Also, do keep in mind that if some force were to be used the piercing can be torn out easily and penetration accomplished. This would occur in a rape senario but also possibly in the heat of passion (especially while under the infulence).
Even though we would all admit that with enough determination, tools, and force the steel belts can be overcome, they still are by far the best security against penetration and with the right design, can even prevent anal penetration.
Now if we can come up with a device to prevent oral penetration we can keep the ladies chaste. (In fact I have seen an orthodontic device that would sure do this.)
Sam |
Robert Pinkerton (Robertpinkerton)
Senior Member
Username: Robertpinkerton
Post Number: 620
Registered: 8-2001
| | Posted on Friday, August 15, 2008 - 8:28 pm: | |
I concur with Sam, both as to the superior security of a steel chastity belt against forcible rape and as to the way in which a rapist forcing through could grossly exacerbate the trauma.
Ringing a young Lady for chastity with an infibulating padlock, provides only against voluntary surrender.
Susan, I wish I did know Lustschloss' current business name and e-mail address. I do not at this writing.
Robert Pinkerton, heresiarch@sbcglobal.net |
Allchasteswede (Allchasteswede)
New member
Username: Allchasteswede
Post Number: 26
Registered: 8-2002
| | Posted on Thursday, July 01, 2010 - 11:32 am: | |
The name of the company is changed to Lustlock.
http://www.lustlock.com/eng/lustlock.html
Ken / Allchasteswede
allchasteswede@yahoo.se |
|