From: Anonymous

Subject: 0/6 comments

It seems the main problem is that metal is inelastic compared to flesh.

A good fit will there for be dependent on the wearer staying in one position, muscles & fat stay in one place with respect to belt & bones.

This is clearly a no no!

The compromise is to make the belt as tight as can be tolerated and to cause some discomfort when major changes of stance take place (e.g. sitting down/standing up/lying down) and the body's geometry changes.

Both of these are difficult to allow for when the belt is ordered.

I note that neosteel are sending a measuring kit, a good idea. The phrase controlled waist could do with some explaining & I am not certain how to do that.

The least satisfactory situation seems to be leaning forward & lifting things. That compresses the abdomen and allows partial withdrawal from the tube. That can be stopped using the ass strap but this limits the time the belt can be worn in the absence of the key holder!

Jones is cooperative and will make alterations and new parts but that adds expense and delays (and you feel a fool). I know a nice man with a big drill and we made new holes at the front of the ass strap, taking in a couple of centimeters and a bit. More secure but see below.

Two problems worried me and the Jones/Tollyboy belts seem prone to both:

The tight point at the lower front is the tube against the scrotum - ouch! contents not so cosy!

Jones warns that the top lock may be difficult to remove. Massive panic! stuck for life!! you may be able to see that the one in the pics has a different fixing - sigh!

I think Latowski's design spreads the pressure at the front and has its locks at the side, but who can go to Germany for measurements?

In all?

Erotic as hell!!

Not comfortable.

-but short of drilling into the pelvic bones direct, an interesting piece of kit.

(anonymously)